GovSprint
← Back to today

Area of Interest: OSW Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE) Business Process Modernization

Department of Defense · Washington Headquarters Services (WHS) · WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES
Account requiredWhy it scored this way

Every reason behind the verdict rather than the headline one — which of your certifications match, how much runway is left, whether the work is your size, and what we would need to know to sharpen it.

Draft the paperwork

Written against this notice and what you have told us about your company. Anything we do not know is marked [NEEDS INPUT] in the draft rather than guessed at — read it before you send it.

Start a free trial to draft these. Nothing is sent to an agency on your behalf, ever — you get a document to review, edit and submit yourself.

Compliance matrix

Every stated and implied requirement, its source section, whether it is mandatory, and where your response will address it.

Proposal outline

A submission skeleton where every required element is a heading with its source requirement quoted beneath it. You write the substance; nothing gets forgotten.

Questions to submit

Genuine ambiguities and requirements that disadvantage a smaller bidder, drafted as questions you can submit before the Q&A deadline.

Past performance write-ups

Which of your prior awards best match this requirement, and draft write-ups in the format the agency asked for.

Solicitation details

Solicitation number
HQ003426AOI04
Notice type
Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
NAICS
541715
Product service code
AC32
Set-aside
Unrestricted
Posted
2026-08-12
Response deadline
Aug 25, 2026, 9:00 PM UTC
Contracting contact
danny.j.uhr.civ@mail.mil

Market intelligence

Account requiredWho wins this work, and what it pays

Comparable awards under NAICS 541715 at this agency — the incumbent, what they were paid, when their period of performance ends, and the real pricing distribution rather than the headline number. From public federal award records.

Statement of work, as posted

Using the authority in 10 U.S.C. § 4022, the Department of War (DOW) Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE) seeks novel business process solution to rapidly prototype a modernized, comprehensive replacement of its existing bespoke business operations workflow platforms and underlying database. Background: The Department of War (DOW) Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE) supports the Office of the Secretary of War (OSW). The Director of CAPE is the principal staff assistant to the Secretary of War for Cost Assessment & Program Evaluation. In fulfilling this role, the Director of CAPE provides non-advocate, fact-based decision support on the size, shape, affordability, disposition and readiness of the future joint force to achieve the National Defense Strategy. The Director’s principal responsibilities include: Analyze and evaluate plans, programs, and budgets in relation to U.S. defense objectives, projected threats, allied contributions, estimated costs, and resource constraints. Review, analyze, and evaluate programs, including classified programs, for executing approved policies. Provide leadership in developing and promoting improved analytical tools and methods for analyzing national security planning and the allocation of resources. Ensure that the costs of DoW programs, including classified programs, are presented accurately and completely. Assess effects of DoW spending on the U.S. economy and evaluate alternative policies to ensure that DoW programs can be implemented efficiently. CAPE develops and maintain tools in four main business lines: Knowledge management Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution System (PPBES) support Business application development Operations research tools DoW Problem Statement: Using the authority in 10 U.S.C. § 4022, CAPE seeks novel business process solution to rapidly prototype a modernized, comprehensive replacement of its existing bespoke business operations workflow platforms and underlying database. The desired solution will provide three distinct functions: Wholistic personnel management of both government employees (civilian and military) and contractors; Budget formulation, expenditure tracking, and contracting functions; Workflow tools to manage custom information flow as well as standard coordination actions. Currently, the existing bespoke tools and applications require a refreshed user interface, a more streamlined data sharing architecture and better integration across the CAPE enterprise and with broader Department of War enterprise solutions, either those offered by Washington Headquarters Service or other Department of War elements as enterprise services for data sharing. Applications and tools cannot always be dynamically refreshed without unintended cascading problems. A preferred solution would allow for dynamic changes to meet evolving needs. The Government seeks to prototype a single comprehensive solution and is open to teaming arrangements utilizing multiple integrated commercial products. Desired Solution Attributes: A modernized personnel management function should provide person and position management, on-boarding, off-boarding, assignments, and other organizational needs utilizing a complete personnel profile such as an online roster, organization chart, mail distro group management, autofill of commonly used documents to include PDFs, development plan creation and tracking, and ability to create customized reports of available data. A modernized budget and contract functions should facilitate full lifecycle contract management and budget status/planning, and acquisition requests and purchase tracking for IT and other supplies. A related personnel function should support IT asset tracking including user/seat/workstation/port info and software license assignments. Modernized workflow capabilities should support development of both specialized workflows such as requests for transmission of clearance information as well as standard routing functions that address coordination requests internally and across the Department. The replacement solution should be able to push and pull data from DoW and OSW Enterprise Systems such as, iCompass, Defense Civilian Personnel Data System (DCPDS), Defense Agencies Initiative (DAI) and Defense Information System for Security (DISS) utilizing interfaces or pre-/post-processing. Special Considerations: Solution must be certified to run on DoW NIPRnet and potential DoDNet, properly display and store PII / IL5 information based on user role and adhere to all records management requirements. Procedures: Any award resulting from this AOI shall be in accordance with the Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) procedures detailed in HQ0034259WHSCSO. The instructions in the CSO, and any additional instruction as specified in this AOI posting, must be followed. Acceptance of a solution not submitted in accordance with the instructions is at the sole discretion of the WHS/AD Agreements Officer. The Government intends to conduct this AOI in three phases as detailed in the CSO. The Government may issue amendments to this AOI. Companies are responsible for monitoring sam.gov for amendments to this AOI posting.

Contact

Point of contact
Danny Uhr
Role
not stated on this notice — SAM publishes a role for only about 5% of them, so this may be a contract specialist rather than the contracting officer
Email
danny.j.uhr.civ@mail.mil
Submit questions

Ambiguities and requirements worth clarifying, written as questions you can send before the deadline.

Open email
Request documents

Ask for attachments, drawings or specifications referenced in the notice but not posted.

Open email

Opens in your own mail client, addressed and with a subject line — you write the message. GovSprint never sends anything on your behalf.

Emails open in your mail client and are sent from your address, so the reply comes back to you and the exchange stays yours. Confirm the correct channel and any question deadline on the notice before sending — many solicitations require questions in a specific way.