Every reason behind the verdict rather than the headline one — which of your certifications match, how much runway is left, whether the work is your size, and what we would need to know to sharpen it.
Written against this notice and what you have told us about your company. Anything we do not know is marked [NEEDS INPUT] in the draft rather than guessed at — read it before you send it.
Start a free trial to draft these. Nothing is sent to an agency on your behalf, ever — you get a document to review, edit and submit yourself.
Compliance matrix
Every stated and implied requirement, its source section, whether it is mandatory, and where your response will address it.
Proposal outline
A submission skeleton where every required element is a heading with its source requirement quoted beneath it. You write the substance; nothing gets forgotten.
Questions to submit
Genuine ambiguities and requirements that disadvantage a smaller bidder, drafted as questions you can submit before the Q&A deadline.
Past performance write-ups
Which of your prior awards best match this requirement, and draft write-ups in the format the agency asked for.
Solicitation details
Solicitation number
16PBGC26Q0037
Notice type
Solicitation
NAICS
541990
Product service code
B599
Set-aside
Unrestricted
Posted
2026-08-06
Response deadline
Aug 20, 2026, 6:00 PM UTC
Place of performance
Washington, DC
Contracting contact
feliciano-merino.david@pbgc.gov
Market intelligence
Account requiredWho wins this work, and what it pays
Comparable awards under NAICS 541990 at this agency — the incumbent, what they were paid, when their period of performance ends, and the real pricing distribution rather than the headline number. From public federal award records.
The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21, Pub. L. No. 112-141) was enacted on July 6, 2012. Section 40233(a) of MAP-21 requires the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) to contract with a capable agency or organization that is independent of PBGC, to conduct annual peer reviews of the Single-Employer (SE) Pension Insurance Modeling System (PIMS) and Multiemployer (ME) PIMS. In practice, comprehensive reviews are conducted at least once every 5 years with targeted, more limited, reviews conducted in interim years. The focus of this Statement of Objectives (SOO) is a targeted review of SE PIMS and ME PIMS to be conducted in 2026-2027. The PIMS models are used to develop PBGC’s annual Projections Report, a 10-year projection of the financial position of each of PBGC’s two insurance programs – the Single-Employer Program and the Multiemployer Program, and a long-term (40-year) evaluation of the solvency of the Multiemployer Program. PBGC also uses these forecasting models to analyze the potential effects of legislative proposals that impact private sector defined benefit plans and the insurance programs, as well as for additional budgeting and analysis internal to PBGC. PBGC has deployed a new, modernized version of the SE PIMS model, which utilizes some alternative modeling assumptions and methods. As part of this deployment, PBGC constructed a new economic scenario generator; the resulting economic scenarios are used in both the SE PIMS and ME PIMS models. This targeted review covers the current versions of the SE PIMS model and the ME PIMS model; it does not cover the prior Legacy version of SE PIMS. PBGC’s Board is seeking a qualified Contractor to perform a targeted peer review of the assumptions and methods used by the PIMS models to incorporate the financial health of plan sponsors in the projections. The remainder of this document sets forth PBGC’s specific expectations, while noting that PBGC would also welcome suggested refinements, based on the Contractor’s depth of experience and expertise in modeling defined benefit pension plans. PBGC will entertain proposed sub-contracting by the Contractor as needed to best accomplish the review.
Contact
Point of contact
David Feliciano-Merino
Role
not stated on this notice — SAM publishes a role for only about 5% of them, so this may be a contract specialist rather than the contracting officer
Email
feliciano-merino.david@pbgc.gov
Submit questions
Ambiguities and requirements worth clarifying, written as questions you can send before the deadline.
Opens in your own mail client, addressed and with a subject line — you write the message. GovSprint never sends anything on your behalf.
Emails open in your mail client and are sent from your address, so the reply comes back to you and the exchange stays yours. Confirm the correct channel and any question deadline on the notice before sending — many solicitations require questions in a specific way.
